Toolkit · Military and Veterans

The Military and Veterans Law Toolkit

50 U.S.C. §§ 3901

Type
Toolkit
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2026-11-24
Topic
Military and Veterans

This toolkit is the front door to military and veterans law on UpLaw. It maps eleven pillars — the SCRA's civil protections during service, USERRA reemployment and antidiscrimination rights, VA service connection and disability ratings, the modernized VA claims and appeals system, veterans' preference in federal hiring, the UCMJ and courts-martial, administrative separations and discharge upgrades, the Feres doctrine and claims against the government, military family law and pension division under the USFSPA, consumer protection under the Military Lending Act, and the Title 10 / Title 32 / state-active-duty overlay that governs the Guard and Reserve. Each pillar gives you the plain-English doctrine, the anchor statute or case, the traps that catch practitioners, and links into UpLaw's deeper guides and checklists. A running example follows one fictional Army Reservist, Staff Sergeant Tomas Vergara, from mobilization through reemployment, a VA claim, a divorce, and a predatory loan. Use it as a research map: skim the landscape, jump to the pillar you need, then follow the links down.

The Military and Veterans Law Toolkit

Military and Veterans > Military and Veterans Law | Published 24 November 2026 - Updated 22 December 2026 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

Military and veterans law is not one body of law. It is a dozen separate regimes — employment, consumer credit, benefits, criminal, family, and administrative — that Congress bolted onto the ordinary law because the ordinary law does not work for someone the government can send overseas on thirty days' notice. This toolkit is the map to all of them.

Keywords: SCRA, USERRA, reemployment rights, VA disability compensation, service connection, VA appeals, veterans preference, UCMJ, courts-martial, discharge upgrade, Feres doctrine, USFSPA, military retired pay, Military Lending Act, National Guard, Title 10, Title 32

How to read this toolkit

There is no single "military law." A servicemember or veteran walking through a lawyer's door is almost always carrying a problem that lives in some other area of law — an employer who will not take her back, a lender charging 200% interest, a divorce, a foreclosure, a denied disability claim — with a military statute layered on top of it that changes the outcome. The skill is recognizing which layer applies.

This toolkit walks the eleven layers, pillar by pillar. It is a research map, not a treatise. Each pillar gives you the doctrine in plain English, the anchor authority, the classic traps, and a link into the deeper UpLaw treatment. For the full doctrinal foundation beneath everything below, keep Military and Veterans Law: A Comprehensive Guide to USERRA, the SCRA, and VA Benefits open in the next tab. If you sit on the other side — an employer with a mobilized employee, or a creditor with an active-duty borrower — start instead with USERRA and SCRA Compliance for Employers and Creditors: A Practical Checklist.

Three ways to use it. Read it end to end once, to build the mental model of how the regimes fit together. Jump to a pillar when you have a live question. Or use the consolidated gated checklist near the end as an intake audit for any servicemember or veteran client.

A running example keeps it concrete. Meet Staff Sergeant Tomas Vergara, a fictional Army Reservist who works in civilian life as a regional service manager for Quarrystone Freight, a mid-size trucking company. Vergara has an apartment lease, a car note, a pre-service credit card, a wife and two children, and eleven years of drilling. He is about to be mobilized for a fifteen-month deployment. By the end of this toolkit, Vergara's mobilization will have touched nearly every pillar below.

The military and veterans landscape at a glance

The eleven pillars, in the order this toolkit walks them:

  1. The SCRA — civil protections during service: interest caps, stays, default-judgment protections, lease terminations. (50 U.S.C. §§ 3901–4043)
  2. USERRA — the right to leave a civilian job for service, come back to it, and not be discriminated against for having served. (38 U.S.C. §§ 4301–4335)
  3. Veterans' benefits — service connection, the rating schedule, and what a disability is worth. (38 U.S.C. §§ 1110, 1131; 38 C.F.R. Part 4)
  4. The VA claims and appeals system — the modernized three-lane structure, the Board, the CAVC, and the Federal Circuit. (Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017)
  5. Veterans' preference — points, retention, and the right to compete in federal hiring. (5 U.S.C. §§ 2108, 3309, 3502; VEOA)
  6. Military justice — the UCMJ, Article 15, and courts-martial. (10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946a)
  7. Administrative separations, discharge upgrades, and record correction — the DRBs and the BCMRs. (10 U.S.C. §§ 1552, 1553)
  8. Claims against the government and the Feres doctrine — why servicemembers usually cannot sue, and the narrow modern exceptions. (Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671–2680)
  9. Military family law — deployment and custody, and division of retired pay under the USFSPA. (10 U.S.C. § 1408)
  10. Consumer protection — the Military Lending Act's 36% cap and the SCRA credit overlay. (10 U.S.C. § 987; 32 C.F.R. Part 232)
  11. The Guard and Reserve overlay — Title 10 vs. Title 32 vs. state active duty, and why the difference decides which statute protects your client.

A structural point that governs the whole field: almost all of this is federal law. USERRA, the SCRA, the VA benefits system, the UCMJ, and the MLA are creatures of Congress and apply uniformly across the fifty states. The two big exceptions are family law — where the USFSPA merely permits state courts to divide retired pay under state property law — and state active duty for the National Guard, where state statutes, not USERRA, supply the reemployment right. Get that distinction wrong and you will advise your client under the wrong statute.

Pillar 1 — The SCRA: civil protections during service

The doctrine. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 3901–4043, exists because a person deployed to Kandahar cannot show up for a default hearing in Ohio. It is a shield, not a sword: it postpones, caps, and terminates civil obligations so that military service does not become a financial and legal catastrophe. Courts read it liberally in the servicemember's favor — a principle the Supreme Court articulated as far back as Boone v. Lightner, 319 U.S. 561 (1943), construing the SCRA's predecessor statute.

The core protections:

  • Default judgment protections (50 U.S.C. § 3931). Before entering default against a non-appearing defendant, the plaintiff must file an affidavit stating whether the defendant is in military service. If the defendant is serving, the court must appoint counsel and may not proceed without one. A default judgment entered in violation of § 3931 can be reopened.
  • Stay of proceedings (§ 3932). A servicemember whose ability to appear is materially affected by service is entitled to a stay of at least 90 days on a proper application — a letter stating how duty prevents appearance and a statement from the commanding officer that leave is not authorized. Further stays are discretionary.
  • The 6% interest cap (§ 3937). Interest on obligations incurred before service is capped at 6% per year for the period of service. Above-6% interest is forgiven, not deferred. For mortgages the cap extends beyond the end of service — confirm the current post-service period, which Congress has adjusted.
  • Foreclosure and repossession (§§ 3952–3953). For obligations secured by property and incurred before service, a creditor generally cannot foreclose or repossess without a court order during service and for a statutory period afterward.
  • Lease terminations (§§ 3955–3956). A servicemember may terminate a residential or motor-vehicle lease upon entry into service, or upon receiving PCS orders or deployment orders of 90 days or more. Cell phone contracts get similar treatment.
  • Tolling (§ 3936). The period of service does not count toward any statute of limitations running for or against the servicemember.
  • Residency and taxation (§ 4001). Service does not change domicile for tax and voting purposes, and the Military Spouses Residency Relief Act extended parallel protection to spouses.

The traps. The 6% cap is not automatic — the servicemember must give written notice with a copy of the orders, and creditors routinely ignore requests that arrive without them. The cap covers pre-service debt only; the credit card Vergara opens after mobilization gets nothing. Default-judgment affidavits are the single most common SCRA violation in consumer and landlord-tenant litigation, and the Department of Justice has extracted substantial settlements from servicers and lessors on exactly that theory. And SCRA protections can be waived, but only in a separate written instrument executed during or after the period of service (§ 3918) — a waiver buried in the original loan agreement is worthless.

Vergara's file. On receipt of mobilization orders, Vergara sends Quarrystone's landlord a written notice terminating his apartment lease effective 30 days after the next rent due date, sends his pre-service credit card issuer a copy of his orders demanding the 6% cap, and does nothing about his newly financed truck — because it was purchased after his orders issued and the cap does not reach it. When a collection suit filed pre-mobilization threatens to go to default, his counsel files a § 3932 application supported by his commander's memorandum and gets a 90-day stay.

Go deeper. USERRA and SCRA Compliance for Employers and Creditors: A Practical Checklist walks the creditor-side compliance program. For the eviction and default mechanics the SCRA overlays, see Residential Landlord-Tenant Compliance and Eviction: A Practical Checklist, and for the general debt-collection regime, The Consumer Protection and Credit Toolkit.

Pillar 2 — USERRA: employment and reemployment rights

The doctrine. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301–4335, does three things. It gives servicemembers the right to take leave for service, the right to be reemployed on return, and the right to be free of discrimination and retaliation because of service.

The reemployment right (§ 4312) has five gates. The employee must (1) give the employer advance notice (written or oral) unless impossible or precluded by military necessity; (2) not exceed five cumulative years of service with that employer — subject to a long list of exemptions in § 4312(c) that swallow most involuntary and wartime service; (3) report back or apply for reemployment within the statutory window (which scales with the length of service — same-day-ish for short absences, up to 90 days for service over 180 days); (4) have a character of service that is not disqualifying under § 4304; and (5) not fall into one of the employer's narrow defenses (changed circumstances making reemployment impossible, undue hardship, or a genuinely brief non-recurrent job).

Clear those gates and the escalator principle kicks in. The returning employee steps back onto the escalator where she would have been had she never left — not the seat she vacated, but the position, seniority, status, and pay she would have attained with reasonable certainty through continued employment. That principle comes from Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U.S. 275 (1946), and is now codified at § 4313. Alabama Power Co. v. Davis, 431 U.S. 581 (1977), applied it to pension credits: military service counts as service for benefit accrual.

Three more provisions do the practical work. Section 4311 bars discrimination and retaliation, with a claimant-friendly standard — service is a motivating factor and the burden then shifts to the employer to prove it would have taken the same action anyway. Section 4316(c) protects the reemployed employee from discharge except for cause for one year (service over 180 days) or 180 days (service of 31–180 days). Section 4317 continues health coverage for up to 24 months and forbids exclusions or waiting periods on reinstatement.

Enforcement. No statute of limitations — § 4327(b) is explicit. No exhaustion requirement either: a claimant may complain to the Department of Labor's Veterans' Employment and Training Service, or go straight to federal court. Prevailing plaintiffs with private counsel may recover fees, and a willful violation doubles damages as liquidated damages (§ 4323(d)). Federal-sector claims run to the Merit Systems Protection Board under § 4324.

The traps. Employers treat USERRA like the FMLA — it is not; there is no 12-month/1,250-hour eligibility threshold, no employer-size floor, and it applies from day one of employment. "Reemployment" does not mean the old job; it means the escalator position, which for a promoted-in-absentia peer group may be higher. And "for cause" under § 4316(c) is genuinely restrictive — it requires reasonable notice that the conduct would cost the job.

Vergara's file. Vergara gives Quarrystone written notice, deploys for fifteen months (well inside the § 4312(c) exemptions for involuntary and contingency-operation service, so his five-year clock is unaffected), and applies for reemployment 40 days after release — inside the 90-day window. His two peers were promoted to district manager during his absence on a fixed seniority schedule. The escalator puts Vergara in a district-manager seat, not his old service-manager seat. Quarrystone's HR director, who "held his exact job open," has still violated USERRA. And Quarrystone may not fire him without cause for a year.

Go deeper. The Employment Law Toolkit: From Hiring to Separation is the front door to the surrounding employment regime; Employment Discrimination Law: A Comprehensive Guide explains the Title VII framework USERRA's motivating-factor test parallels, and Drafting an Employee Handbook That Holds Up: A Practical Checklist covers the military-leave policy every handbook should carry.

Pillar 3 — Veterans' benefits: service connection and ratings

The doctrine. VA disability compensation is paid for a disability "resulting from personal injury suffered or disease contracted in line of duty" — wartime service under 38 U.S.C. § 1110, peacetime under § 1131. Direct service connection has three elements: (1) a current disability; (2) an in-service incurrence or aggravation; and (3) a nexus linking the two. Miss any one and the claim fails, which is why the medical nexus opinion is the single most valuable document in most claims files.

Several doctrines soften those elements:

  • Presumptions. Chronic diseases manifesting to a compensable degree within a year of separation are presumed service-connected (38 U.S.C. § 1112). Herbicide (Agent Orange) exposure carries its own presumptive list (§ 1116); Gulf War undiagnosed and medically unexplained chronic multisymptom illnesses carry another (§ 1117). The PACT Act of 2022 dramatically expanded presumptive conditions tied to burn pits and other toxic exposures. The presumptive lists change — always check the current list rather than relying on a memory of it.
  • Secondary service connection (38 C.F.R. § 3.310) — a disability caused or aggravated by an already service-connected one. Depression secondary to chronic pain is the archetype.
  • Aggravation — a pre-existing condition made worse by service is compensable to the extent of the worsening.
  • The benefit of the doubt. Where the evidence is in "approximate balance," the veteran wins (38 U.S.C. § 5107(b)). This is not preponderance; it is a genuinely pro-claimant standard, and it is routinely under-applied by adjudicators.
  • The duty to assist. VA must help develop the claim — obtaining records, providing an examination where warranted (38 U.S.C. § 5103A). A failure to assist is itself a ground for relief on appeal.

Ratings. Once service connection is established, the disability is rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, 38 C.F.R. Part 4, from 0% to 100% in 10% steps, by reference to diagnostic codes and average impairment in earning capacity. Multiple disabilities are combined using the table at 38 C.F.R. § 4.25 — the notorious "VA math," which is not addition: a 50% and a 30% combine to 65% (rounded to 70%), not 80%, because each rating applies to the remaining "whole" of the person. TDIU (total disability based on individual unemployability, 38 C.F.R. § 4.16) pays at the 100% rate for veterans who cannot maintain substantially gainful employment, even without a schedular 100%.

Two gatekeeping issues. First, character of discharge: a discharge under dishonorable conditions bars benefits (38 U.S.C. § 5303; 38 C.F.R. § 3.12) — which is why Pillar 7 matters so much. Second, effective dates (38 U.S.C. § 5110): benefits generally run from the date of claim, not the date of injury, so filing an intent to file is free money — it preserves an earlier effective date for up to a year.

Vergara's file. Vergara comes home with tinnitus, a lumbar strain, and PTSD symptoms. Tinnitus is a straightforward 10% (a single maximum schedular rating). The back gets rated on range of motion. The PTSD rating turns on occupational and social impairment. His new depression, secondary to chronic back pain, is separately compensable under § 3.310. VA math, not arithmetic, will produce his combined rating.

Pillar 4 — The VA claims and appeals system

The doctrine. The Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (the "AMA," Pub. L. No. 115-55, effective February 19, 2019) replaced the old serial "legacy" appeal with three parallel lanes, elected within one year of an adverse decision:

Lane New evidence? What happens
Supplemental Claim Yes — "new and relevant" evidence required The regional office readjudicates with the new evidence; duty to assist reattaches
Higher-Level Review No A senior adjudicator reviews the same record de novo for error, including a difference of opinion
Notice of Disagreement to the Board Depends on docket Board of Veterans' Appeals review on one of three dockets: Direct Review (no new evidence, no hearing), Evidence Submission (90 days to submit), or Hearing (before a Veterans Law Judge)

From the Board, a veteran may appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) within 120 days (38 U.S.C. § 7266). The CAVC reviews factual findings for clear error and legal questions de novo. From the CAVC, review runs to the Federal Circuit (38 U.S.C. § 7292), whose jurisdiction is sharply limited: it may review the validity or interpretation of a statute or regulation, but generally may not review factual determinations or the application of law to the facts of a particular case absent a constitutional issue. Practitioners lose Federal Circuit appeals constantly by dressing up a factual complaint as a legal one. From there, certiorari.

Attorney fees. This is a genuine practice trap. Under 38 U.S.C. § 5904, a lawyer or accredited agent may not charge a fee for preparing an initial claim. Fees may be charged only after VA issues an initial decision and the claimant files a qualifying appeal or lane election; the fee agreement must be filed with VA; and the representative must be accredited (38 C.F.R. § 14.629). Contingent fees of 20% of past-due benefits are commonly paid directly by VA out of the retroactive award. The proliferation of unaccredited "claim consultants" charging up-front percentage fees is an active enforcement concern — do not become one, and warn clients away from them. At the CAVC, fee-shifting runs through the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. One caution on the professional-responsibility layer sitting on top of § 5904: VA accreditation is a matter of federal law, but your duties on fees, communication, and conflicts come from the rules of the jurisdiction that licenses you. The ABA Model Rules are a model only — they bind no lawyer until a state adopts them, and adopting states diverge (California's rules differ notably in numbering and substance). Check your own state's rules and ethics opinions, not a national summary.

The traps. Missing the one-year lane election window turns a live claim into a finally decided one, recoverable only through the much harder route of a supplemental claim with new and relevant evidence or a clear and unmistakable error (CUE) motion — an extraordinarily narrow remedy requiring an undebatable error that would have manifestly changed the outcome. Choosing Higher-Level Review when you have new evidence wastes a lane. And the "Direct Review" Board docket is fastest precisely because it forecloses new evidence.

Go deeper. VA adjudication is administrative law with its own vocabulary, and the architecture will be familiar to anyone who knows the APA. See Administrative Law: A Comprehensive Guide to Agency Action and Judicial Review and The Administrative Law Toolkit; for the mechanics of attacking agency action generally, Challenging Agency Action Under the APA: A Practical Checklist. For appellate craft once you reach an Article III or Article I court, Federal Civil Appeals: A Comprehensive Guide and Taking a Civil Appeal: A Practical Checklist.

Pillar 5 — Veterans' preference and federal employment

The doctrine. Veterans' preference is a federal civil-service concept, not a private-sector mandate. Under 5 U.S.C. § 2108, eligible veterans receive 5-point preference (qualifying active service) or 10-point preference (service-connected disability, Purple Heart, or certain derived preferences for spouses, widows/widowers, and mothers), added to a passing examination score under 5 U.S.C. § 3309. Preference also confers retention advantage in a reduction in force (5 U.S.C. § 3502) and, for 30%-or-more disabled veterans, access to non-competitive appointing authorities.

The Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 (VEOA) gives preference-eligibles the right to compete for merit-promotion vacancies otherwise closed to outsiders, and creates an enforcement path: complaint to DOL/VETS, then appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board. USERRA claims against federal employers follow the same MSPB route (38 U.S.C. § 4324).

The traps. Preference is not a hiring quota and does not guarantee selection; it adjusts scores and retention standing. Many states have their own veterans' preference statutes for state and municipal employment — they vary widely, and a private employer that unilaterally prefers veterans should confirm the practice is lawful in its jurisdiction (federal law expressly permits voluntary veterans' preference by private employers in most circumstances, but state law and disparate-impact exposure deserve a look). And note the flip side: veteran status is not itself a protected class under Title VII — the protections come from USERRA and, for disabled veterans, the ADA and Rehabilitation Act. See Employment Discrimination Law: A Comprehensive Guide.

Adjacent leverage: procurement. Veteran-owned businesses get preferential treatment in federal contracting — service-disabled veteran-owned small business set-asides government-wide, and the VA's "Vets First" program under 38 U.S.C. §§ 8127–8128, which the Supreme Court held to be mandatory in Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 579 U.S. 162 (2016): when two or more qualified veteran-owned small businesses can compete at a fair price, VA "shall" restrict the award to them — even for orders off the Federal Supply Schedule. For the mechanics see Government Contracts: A Comprehensive Guide to Federal Procurement, The Government Contracts Toolkit, and Small Business Set-Asides and SBA Certification: A Practical Checklist.

Pillar 6 — Military justice and the UCMJ

The doctrine. The Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946a, is a complete criminal code and court system, implemented through the Manual for Courts-Martial (promulgated by executive order). It reaches conduct that has no civilian analogue — disrespect toward a superior (Art. 89), failure to obey an order (Art. 92), absence without leave (Art. 86) — and general articles punishing conduct unbecoming an officer (Art. 133) and conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline or service-discrediting (Art. 134). The Supreme Court upheld those famously open-textured articles in Parker v. Levy, 417 U.S. 733 (1974), on the ground that the military is "a specialized society separate from civilian society."

Jurisdiction turns on status, not on the offense. In Solorio v. United States, 483 U.S. 435 (1987), the Court held that court-martial jurisdiction depends solely on the accused's status as a servicemember — expressly overruling O'Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258 (1969), which had required the offense to be "service connected." Do not cite O'Callahan for a live rule; it is dead law.

The forums. Article 15 nonjudicial punishment (10 U.S.C. § 815) handles minor misconduct without a criminal conviction — but it goes in the record and can drive a separation. Courts-martial come in three tiers under Article 16: summary, special, and general, escalating in procedural protection and available punishment. A general court-martial for a non-capital offense requires an Article 32 preliminary hearing first. Appeals run to the service Courts of Criminal Appeals (Art. 66), then to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF, Art. 67), and then, in defined circumstances, to the Supreme Court — a path the Court confirmed and explained in Ortiz v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2165 (2018), which described the military justice system as genuinely judicial in character.

Two things civilian counsel routinely miss. First, Article 31(b) rights warnings are broader than Miranda: any person subject to the code who questions a suspect must warn, regardless of custody. Second, recent National Defense Authorization Acts stripped commanders of prosecutorial discretion over serious offenses — including sexual assault, murder, and domestic violence — and vested it in independent Offices of Special Trial Counsel. This reform is recent and still settling; verify the current scope of covered offenses rather than relying on a summary.

Pillar 7 — Administrative separations, discharge upgrades, and record correction

The doctrine. Most servicemembers who leave the military badly do so administratively, not by court-martial. Administrative separation (governed for enlisted members by DoD Instruction 1332.14 and service regulations) produces a characterization of service: Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable (OTH). Punitive discharges — bad-conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, officer dismissal — can be adjudged only by a court-martial. Depending on the characterization contemplated and years of service, the member may have a right to an administrative separation board with counsel, witnesses, and cross-examination. That board is often the last, best chance to fix the record; the appellate paths afterward are far narrower.

Why characterization is everything. It determines VA benefit eligibility (38 C.F.R. § 3.12), GI Bill access, home-loan guaranty eligibility, federal hiring preference, and — as a practical matter — civilian employability. An OTH discharge is not a criminal conviction, but it functions like one in the labor market. See Running Background Checks Under the FCRA: A Practical Checklist for the employer-side rules that govern how that record may be used.

The two upgrade routes.

  • Discharge Review Boards (10 U.S.C. § 1553; DD Form 293). Each service has one. They may upgrade a characterization or change the narrative reason for separation, applying standards of equity and propriety. Jurisdiction runs for 15 years from discharge, and DRBs cannot touch discharges adjudged by a general court-martial.
  • Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (10 U.S.C. § 1552; DD Form 149). Broader and slower. A BCMR may correct any military record to remedy an error or injustice — including discharges outside the DRB's 15-year window. There is a three-year limitations period running from discovery of the error, but the board may waive it in the interest of justice, and routinely does.

The liberal-consideration memoranda. A series of Department of Defense policy memoranda — the 2014 Hagel memorandum (PTSD), the 2017 Kurta memorandum (mental health conditions, TBI, sexual assault, and sexual harassment), and the 2018 Wilkie memorandum (clemency and equity) — direct the boards to give liberal consideration to petitions where an undiagnosed condition may have contributed to the misconduct underlying a discharge. These memoranda transformed upgrade practice. Cite them by name in every petition where they apply.

Judicial review. A BCMR denial is reviewable in federal district court under the APA on an arbitrary-and-capricious standard, and back-pay claims may run to the Court of Federal Claims under the Tucker Act and the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204. The standard is deferential, and the record you build before the board is the record the court reviews — so build it there. See Suing the Government: A Guide to Damages in Administrative and Public-Entity Litigation.

Pillar 8 — Claims against the government and the Feres doctrine

The doctrine. The Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671–2680) waives sovereign immunity for the ordinary negligence of federal employees — with a mandatory administrative claim first (28 U.S.C. § 2675; the SF-95), a two-year presentment deadline and a six-month window to sue after denial (28 U.S.C. § 2401(b)).

Then comes Feres. In Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), the Supreme Court held that the FTCA does not permit servicemembers to recover for injuries that "arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service." The doctrine has no textual home in the FTCA — the Court built it from the availability of the veterans' benefits system, the "distinctly federal" nature of the military relationship, and the need to preserve military discipline. It has been reaffirmed (United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987)), extended to constitutional damages claims against superiors (Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296 (1983); United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987)), and criticized by Justices across the ideological spectrum — but it remains the law, and it is broad. Military medical malpractice, training injuries, and on-base accidents are typically barred.

The narrow modern crack. Congress did not overrule Feres. It did, in the FY2020 NDAA, create an administrative claims process at 10 U.S.C. § 2733a permitting servicemembers to file medical malpractice claims against DoD healthcare providers — resolved inside the Department, with no right to sue in federal court. This is a real remedy and an easily missed one. Note also that Feres does not bar claims by family members or civilians injured by government negligence, nor claims by veterans for post-service VA medical malpractice — VA malpractice is an ordinary FTCA claim, and 38 U.S.C. § 1151 separately provides benefits (compensation as if service-connected) for additional disability caused by VA care.

Vergara's file. A VA hospital's surgical error during a post-discharge back operation is not barred by Feres: he is a veteran, the care was post-service, and he has two independent routes — an FTCA suit and a § 1151 benefits claim. An identical error at a military treatment facility while he was still on active duty would be barred from court, and would run instead through the § 2733a administrative process.

Pillar 9 — Military family law: custody and pension division under the USFSPA

The doctrine — and the critical framing. Family law is state law. The federal statutes here do not create a national rule; they permit or limit what state courts may do. Verify your state's rule on every point below.

Retired pay. In McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210 (1981), the Supreme Court held that federal law preempted state courts from dividing military retired pay. Congress responded with the Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1408, which authorizes — but does not require — a state court to treat disposable retired pay as marital property "in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction of such court." Whether and how it is divided is a question of your state's community-property or equitable-distribution law. See Divorce: A Comprehensive Guide to Dissolution, Property Division, Support, and Custody and The Family Law Toolkit.

The traps here are famous and expensive:

  • The "10/10 rule" is not a division rule. A former spouse needs 10 years of marriage overlapping 10 years of creditable service only to receive direct payment from DFAS (§ 1408(d)(2)). A court may divide retired pay after a two-year marriage — the spouse just has to collect from the member. Lawyers who tell a nine-year spouse she has "no claim" commit malpractice.
  • The 50% cap applies to DFAS direct payments of disposable retired pay (§ 1408(e)(1)); it is not a cap on what a court may award, and it rises when child support and alimony garnishment under 42 U.S.C. § 659 is layered in.
  • The frozen benefit rule. For divorces finalized after the FY2017 NDAA amendments (late December 2016), the divisible amount is generally computed using the member's rank and creditable service at the time of divorce, adjusted for cost-of-living — not at retirement. This dramatically changed the math for young divorcing couples. Confirm the current formula and DFAS's implementing guidance.
  • The VA waiver problem. A veteran who waives retired pay to receive tax-free VA disability compensation shrinks the divisible pot. In Mansell v. Mansell, 490 U.S. 581 (1989), the Court held states may not divide the waived portion. In Howell v. Howell, 137 S. Ct. 1400 (2017), it held a state court may not order the veteran to indemnify the former spouse for a post-divorce waiver either. The practical answer is to negotiate for it explicitly at the time of the decree — through offsetting assets or alimony — not to litigate it after.
  • The Survivor Benefit Plan. Retired pay stops at the member's death; SBP (10 U.S.C. §§ 1447–1455) is the annuity that continues it. A former-spouse SBP election must be made — or deemed by the spouse's own filing — within one year of the decree. Miss it and the entire award can evaporate on the member's death. This is the most common malpractice trap in military divorce.
  • 20/20/20. Twenty years of marriage, twenty of creditable service, twenty of overlap gives the former spouse continued TRICARE and commissary/exchange access (10 U.S.C. § 1072(2)(F)). 20/20/15 gives limited transitional health coverage.

Custody and deployment. The SCRA's child-custody provision, 50 U.S.C. § 3938, limits a court's ability to enter a permanent custody modification while a servicemember is deployed and restricts using deployment against the parent — while expressly deferring to state law that offers greater protection. Many states have also adopted the Uniform Law Commission's Uniform Deployed Parents Custody and Visitation Act, which supplies a full framework for temporary custody agreements, delegation of visitation to a stepparent or grandparent, and expedited post-deployment restoration. Check whether your state is among them.

Beneficiary designations. SGLI and VGLI life insurance beneficiary designations are governed by federal law and override contrary state-law claims and even divorce decrees — the Supreme Court so held in Ridgway v. Ridgway, 454 U.S. 46 (1981). A divorce decree that "awards" the policy to a former spouse but leaves the SGLI designation naming a parent will pay the parent. Update the form. See The Estate Planning and Wealth Transfer Toolkit and Wills, Trusts, and Probate: A Comprehensive Estate Planning Guide.

Pillar 10 — Consumer protection for servicemembers (the MLA and the SCRA overlay)

The doctrine. The Military Lending Act, 10 U.S.C. § 987, and its implementing rule at 32 C.F.R. Part 232, cap the cost of consumer credit to covered borrowers — active-duty servicemembers and their dependents — at a 36% Military Annual Percentage Rate (MAPR). The MAPR is deliberately broader than the TILA APR: it sweeps in most fees, credit insurance premiums, and add-on products, which is exactly how a nominally 30% loan becomes an illegal one.

The MLA also prohibits: mandatory arbitration clauses, waivers of SCRA or other federal rights, prepayment penalties, requiring repayment by allotment, and (for the classic payday product) rollovers and refinancings. Required oral and written disclosures must be given before consummation. Violations render the contract void from inception, and the Act supplies a private right of action with actual damages, punitive damages, and fees — plus criminal penalties for knowing violations.

Scope, precisely. The 2015 rule expanded the MLA from a narrow set of products to most consumer credit covered by TILA and Regulation Z. But it excludes residential mortgages and purchase-money loans secured by the vehicle or personal property being financed. That exclusion is where the counseling happens: the 36% cap will not save a servicemember from a brutal buy-here-pay-here car loan. What may help there is the SCRA's 6% cap (only for pre-service debt), state usury and UDAP law, and the deceptive-practices theories in Consumer Protection Law: A Comprehensive Guide to the FDCPA, FCRA, TCPA, and State UDAP Statutes.

The enforcement architecture. The CFPB maintains an Office of Servicemember Affairs (12 U.S.C. § 5493(e)); the DOJ has an active SCRA enforcement practice; and state attorneys general enforce state UDAP statutes, which frequently have military-specific provisions. On the collection side, FDCPA Debt Collection Compliance: A Practical Checklist and The Consumer Protection and Credit Toolkit carry the general framework.

Vergara's file. Two months before mobilization, Vergara takes a $3,000 installment loan carrying 29.99% stated interest plus a mandatory "loan protection" product and a monthly participation fee. Computed as a MAPR, the all-in cost exceeds 36%. The loan is a covered consumer credit product and is not purchase-money secured. It is void — and the arbitration clause buried in it is unenforceable against him as a matter of federal law.

Pillar 11 — The National Guard and Reserve: Title 10 vs. Title 32 vs. state active duty

The doctrine — the single most consequential distinction in this toolkit. A Guard member can serve in three different legal statuses, and the status determines which body of law protects and governs her:

Status Who commands Who pays Key consequences
Title 10 (federal active duty) The President Federal Full USERRA and SCRA coverage; subject to the UCMJ; Posse Comitatus Act restricts domestic law-enforcement use
Title 32 (federally funded, state controlled) The Governor Federal USERRA coverage (full-time National Guard duty is service in the uniformed services); SCRA coverage for qualifying calls over 30 consecutive days under 32 U.S.C. § 502(f) tied to a national emergency; Posse Comitatus does not apply
State Active Duty (SAD) The Governor State USERRA does not apply. Reemployment rights, if any, come from state statute. State code of military justice, not the UCMJ

That third row is the trap. A Guard member activated by her governor for a hurricane response on state orders who is fired for missing work has no USERRA claim. Her remedy is her state's military-leave statute — and those statutes vary enormously in coverage, remedies, and limitations periods. Read the orders before you read the statute.

Other Guard/Reserve specifics. Reserve-component retirement is points-based and generally does not begin paying until age 60 (10 U.S.C. § 12731), reduced for certain post-2008 qualifying active service — which matters enormously in a divorce, because the divisible asset may be decades from payment. Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR) offers free, informal mediation of USERRA disputes and resolves a great many of them before litigation; use it. And employers should know that "differential pay" (making up the gap between military and civilian salary) is voluntary under federal law but is increasingly standard, and once promised in a handbook it can become contractually enforceable.

Two adjacent doors worth knowing. Service can accelerate naturalization — 8 U.S.C. § 1439 (peacetime service) and § 1440 (service during designated periods of hostilities) relax residence and physical-presence requirements, and posthumous citizenship is available for those who die from service-connected injury. See Naturalization: A Comprehensive Guide to the N-400 Process and The Immigration and Citizenship Toolkit.

The landscape as a working checklist

Run this at intake for any servicemember or veteran client. Every "no" is a door you have not opened.

Status and orders

  • [ ] Obtained and read the actual orders — Title 10, Title 32, or state active duty?
  • [ ] Confirmed the dates of service (the SCRA and USERRA clocks both key off them)
  • [ ] Confirmed the character of discharge and whether it bars VA benefits

SCRA (during service)

  • [ ] Sent written 6% interest-cap requests with a copy of orders, on pre-service debt only
  • [ ] Checked every pending civil case for a § 3931 military-service affidavit and default exposure
  • [ ] Applied for a § 3932 stay where service materially affects the ability to appear
  • [ ] Evaluated lease terminations (residential, motor vehicle, cell phone) on PCS or 90+ day deployment orders
  • [ ] Confirmed no foreclosure or repossession without a court order on pre-service secured debt
  • [ ] Confirmed any purported waiver was executed during or after service, in a separate instrument

USERRA (employment)

  • [ ] Advance notice given to the employer; five-year cumulative cap checked against the § 4312(c) exemptions
  • [ ] Reemployment application filed inside the correct window for the length of service
  • [ ] Escalator position identified — not the old seat
  • [ ] Health coverage reinstated with no waiting period; pension service credited (§§ 4317–4318)
  • [ ] "For cause" discharge protection tracked (one year / 180 days under § 4316(c))
  • [ ] ESGR mediation considered before filing

VA benefits

  • [ ] Intent to file submitted to lock the effective date
  • [ ] All three elements of service connection addressed; nexus opinion obtained
  • [ ] Presumptive lists checked (herbicide, Gulf War, PACT Act toxic exposure) — current list, not remembered list
  • [ ] Secondary conditions claimed (38 C.F.R. § 3.310)
  • [ ] TDIU considered where employment is not sustainable (38 C.F.R. § 4.16)
  • [ ] Lane elected within one year of the decision; 120-day CAVC clock calendared
  • [ ] Representative is accredited; fee agreement filed; no fee charged on an initial claim

Records and discharge

  • [ ] DRB (15 years) vs. BCMR (broader, 3-year waivable clock) route selected
  • [ ] Liberal-consideration memoranda (Hagel/Kurta/Wilkie) invoked where applicable
  • [ ] Full record built before the board — that is the record a court will review

Claims and litigation

  • [ ] Feres analyzed: was the injury "incident to service"?
  • [ ] 10 U.S.C. § 2733a DoD medical-malpractice administrative claim considered
  • [ ] FTCA SF-95 filed within two years; suit within six months of denial
  • [ ] 38 U.S.C. § 1151 benefits claim considered for VA-care-caused disability

Family and money

  • [ ] Retired pay division analyzed under state law (not the 10/10 myth)
  • [ ] Frozen-benefit formula applied for post-2016 divorces
  • [ ] VA-waiver risk allocated in the decree (Mansell; Howell)
  • [ ] Former-spouse SBP election made or deemed within one year
  • [ ] 20/20/20 status checked
  • [ ] SGLI/VGLI beneficiary designation updated (Ridgway)
  • [ ] Every consumer loan screened against the 36% MAPR and the MLA's prohibited terms

Primary Authority

Statutes

  • Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 3901–4043 (default judgments § 3931; stays § 3932; limitations tolling § 3936; 6% interest cap § 3937; foreclosure and repossession §§ 3952–3953; lease terminations §§ 3955–3956; child custody § 3938; waivers § 3918; residency § 4001)
  • Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301–4335 (definitions § 4303; discrimination § 4311; reemployment eligibility § 4312; escalator position § 4313; disqualifying service § 4304; post-reemployment protection § 4316(c); health plans § 4317; pensions § 4318; enforcement §§ 4323–4324; no limitations period § 4327(b))
  • Veterans' benefits: 38 U.S.C. §§ 1110, 1131 (basic entitlement); § 1112 (chronic-disease presumptions); § 1116 (herbicide exposure); § 1117 (Gulf War illness); § 1151 (VA-care-caused disability); § 5103A (duty to assist); § 5107(b) (benefit of the doubt); § 5110 (effective dates); § 5303 (character of discharge); § 5904 (fees); 38 C.F.R. Parts 3 and 4
  • Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017, Pub. L. No. 115-55; judicial review at 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252, 7266, 7292
  • Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act of 2022
  • Veterans' preference: 5 U.S.C. §§ 2108, 3309, 3502; Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998
  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946a (Art. 15 § 815; Art. 16 § 816; Art. 31 § 831; Art. 32 § 832; Arts. 66–67 §§ 866–867); Manual for Courts-Martial
  • Record correction and discharge review: 10 U.S.C. §§ 1552, 1553; DoD Instruction 1332.14
  • Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2401(b), 2671–2680, 2675; DoD medical malpractice claims, 10 U.S.C. § 2733a
  • Uniformed Services Former Spouses' Protection Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1408; Survivor Benefit Plan, 10 U.S.C. §§ 1447–1455; former-spouse benefits, 10 U.S.C. § 1072(2)(F)
  • Military Lending Act, 10 U.S.C. § 987; 32 C.F.R. Part 232
  • Guard and Reserve: 32 U.S.C. § 502(f); reserve retirement, 10 U.S.C. § 12731; Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1385
  • Veteran-owned small business contracting: 38 U.S.C. §§ 8127–8128; 15 U.S.C. § 657f

Cases

Secondary sources

  • Department of Defense policy memoranda on liberal consideration in discharge upgrade petitions (Hagel, 2014; Kurta, 2017; Wilkie, 2018)
  • Uniform Law Commission, Uniform Deployed Parents Custody and Visitation Act (2012) — adopted in a minority of states; confirm your jurisdiction
  • Department of Labor, Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS) USERRA guidance; Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve (ESGR) materials
  • CFPB Office of Servicemember Affairs reports and MLA examination guidance

A note on currency: the presumptive-condition lists under the PACT Act, the scope of the Offices of Special Trial Counsel, the SCRA's post-service mortgage protection period, and DFAS's frozen-benefit implementation guidance all change. Verify each against the current source before relying on it.

Related UpLaw Resources

Related Guides & Articles

Related Checklists

Related Toolkits

This toolkit is general legal information from UpLaw (uplaw.us), not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Military and veterans law is heavily federal, but family law, state active duty, and state veterans' preference are governed by state law and vary; benefit rules, presumptive lists, and dollar figures change frequently. Verify current requirements and consult qualified counsel — including an accredited VA representative where benefits are at issue — before acting.