Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Robinson v. Central Brass Manufacturing Co.

126 L. Ed. 2d 60

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1993-10-04
Topic
general

reaffirming that pursuit of internal remedies though optional can toll the limitations period because it furthers intra-union resolution of grievances | reaffirming that pursuit of internal remedies though optional can toll the limitations period because it furthers intra-union resolution of grievances | concluding in that case that no government action threatened to punish any protected speech and, thus, holding that there was no chilling effect to be safeguarded against | completely futile appeals that can afford plaintiff no relief do not toll statute; however, tolling is left to court's discretion | completely futile appeals that can afford plaintiff no relief do not toll statute; however, tolling is left to court’s discretion | To establish a constitutional violation on the basis of alleged gerrymandering, a plaintiff must show “intentional discrimination against an identifiable political group and an actual discriminatory effect on that group.”

Citator

Cited by
37 opinions

510 U.S. 827

Robinson
v.
Central Brass Manufacturing Co. et al.

No. 92-2042.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 987 F. 2d 1235.