Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Robinson v. Central Brass Manufacturing Co.
126 L. Ed. 2d 60
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-10-04
- Topic
- general
reaffirming that pursuit of internal remedies though optional can toll the limitations period because it furthers intra-union resolution of grievances | reaffirming that pursuit of internal remedies though optional can toll the limitations period because it furthers intra-union resolution of grievances | concluding in that case that no government action threatened to punish any protected speech and, thus, holding that there was no chilling effect to be safeguarded against | completely futile appeals that can afford plaintiff no relief do not toll statute; however, tolling is left to court's discretion | completely futile appeals that can afford plaintiff no relief do not toll statute; however, tolling is left to court’s discretion | To establish a constitutional violation on the basis of alleged gerrymandering, a plaintiff must show “intentional discrimination against an identifiable political group and an actual discriminatory effect on that group.”
Citator
- Cited by
- 37 opinions
Robinson
v.
Central Brass Manufacturing Co. et al.
No. 92-2042.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 987 F. 2d 1235.