Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Robinson v. Central Brass Manufacturing Co.
510 U.S. 827
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1993-10-04
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- reaffirming that pursuit of internal remedies though optional can toll the limitations period because it furthers intra-union resolution of grievances
- concluding in that case that no government action threatened to punish any protected speech and, thus, holding that there was no chilling effect to be safeguarded against
- completely futile appeals that can afford plaintiff no relief do not toll statute; however, tolling is left to court's discretion
- To establish a constitutional violation on the basis of alleged gerrymandering, a plaintiff must show “intentional discrimination against an identifiable political group and an actual discriminatory effect on that group.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Robinson v. Central Brass Manufacturing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 82 opinions
Robinson
v.
Central Brass Manufacturing Co. et al.
No. 92-2042.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 6th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 987 F. 2d 1235.