Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Acclaim Systems, Inc. v. Lohutko

600 Pa. 742

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania
Date
2009-01-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • explaining that written guilty plea colloquy can supplement oral colloquy in demonstrating voluntariness of plea
  • explaining that issues not raised in PCRA petition are waived
  • “[Nothing in the rule precludes the supplementation of the oral colloquy by a written colloquy that is read, completed, and signed by the defendant and made a part of the plea proceedings.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Acclaim Systems, Inc. v. Lohutko. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
14 opinions
964 A.2d 893 (2009)

ACCLAIM SYSTEMS, INC.
v.
LOHUTKO.

No. 628 MAL (2008).

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

January 20, 2009.

Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.