Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Acclaim Systems, Inc. v. Lohutko
600 Pa. 742
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 2009-01-20
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- explaining that written guilty plea colloquy can supplement oral colloquy in demonstrating voluntariness of plea
- explaining that issues not raised in PCRA petition are waived
- “[Nothing in the rule precludes the supplementation of the oral colloquy by a written colloquy that is read, completed, and signed by the defendant and made a part of the plea proceedings.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Acclaim Systems, Inc. v. Lohutko. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 14 opinions
964 A.2d 893 (2009)
ACCLAIM SYSTEMS, INC.
No. 628 MAL (2008).
ACCLAIM SYSTEMS, INC.
v.
LOHUTKO.
No. 628 MAL (2008).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
January 20, 2009.Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal. Denied.