Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 323 N.C. 704 (1989)

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 323 N.C. 704 (1989), 323 N.C. 704 (N.C. 1989)

Type: Opinion
Court: Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction: Nclaw
Date: 1989-01-01
Topic: general

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 323 N.C. 704 (1989)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1989 IN RE KOZY No. 482P88. Case below: 91 N.C. App. 342. Petition by Kozy for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31 denied 4 January 1989. KIRBY BLDG.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 323 N.C. 704 (1989). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,323 N.C. 704(1989)

Supreme Court of North Carolina

1989

IN RE KOZY No. 482P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 342.

Petition by Kozy for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1989.

KIRBY BLDG. SYSTEMS v. McNEIL No. 481P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 444.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1989.

LAMB v. McKESSON CORP. No. 467P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 288.

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 January 1989. Petition by Appellant (Lamb) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1989.

MACK v. MOORE No. 490P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 478.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1989.

MOORE v. HENLINE No. 483P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 585.

Petition by defendant (R. C. Henline) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 4 January 1989. Motion by plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 January 1989.Page 705