Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 91 N.C. App. 288 (1988)

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED Op., 91 N.C. App. 288 (1988), 91 N.C. App. 288 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988)

Type
Opinion
Court
Nclaw North Carolina
Jurisdiction
Nclaw
Date
1988-01-01
Topic
general

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 91 N.C. App. 288 (1988)North Carolina Court of Appeals Filed 2 August 1988 [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ADJATEY v. SKINES Guilford No Error No. 8818SC4 (86CVS3428) DAVIS v. CITY OF ARCHDALE Randolph Affirmed No. 8719SC274 (85CVS307) HOBSON v. CAVE Buncombe Affirmed No. 8728SC298 (86CVS1276) HOFFMAN v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, 91 N.C. App. 288 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

CASES REPORTED WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION,91 N.C. App. 288(1988)
North Carolina Court of Appeals
Filed 2 August 1988


ADJATEY v. SKINES Guilford No Error No. 8818SC4 (86CVS3428)

DAVIS v. CITY OF ARCHDALE Randolph Affirmed No. 8719SC274 (85CVS307)

HOBSON v. CAVE Buncombe Affirmed No. 8728SC298 (86CVS1276)

HOFFMAN v. SMITH Durham No error in trial; No. 8714SC1040 (84CVS01435) remanded for amendment of judgment

IN RE STATE v. Wake Reversed and BEACON INS. CO. (85CVS444) Remanded No. 8710SC1130

LAMB v. McKESSON CORP. Rockingham Affirmed No. 8717SC1195 (86CVS388)

MIMS v. N.C. CRIMINAL Cabarrus Affirmed JUSTICE EDUCATION AND (87CVS0440) TRAINING STANDARDS COMM. No. 8719SC1105

MURDOCK v. EAST COAST OIL Onslow Affirmed No. 874SC1168 (86CVS898)

SHORE v. BROWN Yadkin Affirmed in part; No. 8723SC856 (86CVS281) reversed in part

STATE v. GALLIMORE Randolph No Error No. 8719SC1252 (85CRS8317)

STATE v. HUGHES Rockingham Remanded for No. 8717SC1254 (87CRS3245) Resentencing (87CRS3246) (87CRS3247) (87CRS3248) (87CRS3249) (87CRS3250)

STATE v. SPENCE Durham No Error No. 8714SC1235 (86CRS12428) (86CRS40780)

STATE v. TATE Iredell No Error No. 8722SC1230 (87CRS1638) (87CRS2945)Page 289
  1. [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ↩