Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Naegele

State v. Naegele, 84 Ohio St. 3d 19 (Ohio 1998)

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Ohio
Date
1998-11-25
Topic
general

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 19.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. NAEGELE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Naegele, 1998-Ohio-701.] Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook. (No. 98-467—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, No.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Naegele. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
84 Ohio St.3d 19
.]




            THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. NAEGELE, APPELLANT.
                      [Cite as State v. Naegele, 
1998-Ohio-701
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
        judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook.
   (No. 98-467—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
   CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, No. CA97-04-043.
                                  __________________
        Christian Erhardt, Jr., for appellant.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 
83 Ohio St.3d 404
, 
700 N.E.2d 570
.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
                                  __________________