Opinion · Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Naegele
State v. Naegele, 84 Ohio St. 3d 19 (Ohio 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ohio
- Date
- 1998-11-25
- Topic
- general
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 19.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. NAEGELE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Naegele, 1998-Ohio-701.] Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook. (No. 98-467—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, No.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Naegele. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at84 Ohio St.3d 19
.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. NAEGELE, APPELLANT.
[Cite as State v. Naegele, 1998-Ohio-701
.]
Criminal procedure—Classification as sexual predator—Court of appeals’
judgment affirmed on authority of State v. Cook.
(No. 98-467—Submitted October 13, 1998—Decided November 25, 1998.)
CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Clermont County, No. CA97-04-043.
__________________
Christian Erhardt, Jr., for appellant.
__________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of
State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404
,700 N.E.2d 570
.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and
LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
__________________