Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Clodfelter v. Bates
Clodfelter v. Bates, 265 S.E.2d 394 (N.C. 1980)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1980-02-06
- Topic
- real-estate
265 S.E.2d 394 (1980) Fred C. CLODFELTER, Sr. v. R. L. BATES and Ruby Bates, Jim Peacock and Louise Peacock, Ned Beeker and Mary Beeker, William McCormick and Betty Sue McCormick, Bobby Joe Clodfelter and Amy Clodfelter, and Fred Clodfelter Construction, Inc., and R.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clodfelter v. Bates. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
Fred C. CLODFELTER, Sr.
v.
R. L. BATES and Ruby Bates, Jim Peacock and Louise Peacock, Ned Beeker and Mary Beeker, William McCormick and Betty Sue McCormick, Bobby Joe Clodfelter and Amy Clodfelter, and Fred Clodfelter Construction, Inc., and R. L. Bates, Trustee.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
February 6, 1980.Billings, Burns & Wells, for plaintiff.
Stoner, Bowers & Gray, for R. L. Bates, Ruby Bates, Jim Peacock, Louise Peacock, Mary Beeker, William McCormick, Betty Sue McCormick, Bobby Joe Clodfelter, Amy Clodfelter, and R. L. Bates, Trustee.
Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, for Ned Beeker.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 44 N.C.App. 107, 260 S.E.2d 672. Denied.