Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina

Clodfelter v. Bates

Clodfelter v. Bates, 265 S.E.2d 394 (N.C. 1980)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jurisdiction
North Carolina
Date
1980-02-06
Topic
real-estate

265 S.E.2d 394 (1980) Fred C. CLODFELTER, Sr. v. R. L. BATES and Ruby Bates, Jim Peacock and Louise Peacock, Ned Beeker and Mary Beeker, William McCormick and Betty Sue McCormick, Bobby Joe Clodfelter and Amy Clodfelter, and Fred Clodfelter Construction, Inc., and R.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Clodfelter v. Bates. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

265 S.E.2d 394 (1980)

Fred C. CLODFELTER, Sr.
v.
R. L. BATES and Ruby Bates, Jim Peacock and Louise Peacock, Ned Beeker and Mary Beeker, William McCormick and Betty Sue McCormick, Bobby Joe Clodfelter and Amy Clodfelter, and Fred Clodfelter Construction, Inc., and R. L. Bates, Trustee.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 6, 1980.

Billings, Burns & Wells, for plaintiff.

Stoner, Bowers & Gray, for R. L. Bates, Ruby Bates, Jim Peacock, Louise Peacock, Mary Beeker, William McCormick, Betty Sue McCormick, Bobby Joe Clodfelter, Amy Clodfelter, and R. L. Bates, Trustee.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, for Ned Beeker.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 44 N.C.App. 107, 260 S.E.2d 672. Denied.