Almost everything people believe about platform liability is wrong in one of two directions: either platforms are immune from everything, or they are responsible for everything users post. This article explains what the law actually says. It starts with the twenty-six words of Section 230, what they cover, and the four significant things they do not. It explains why the statute protects moderation as much as it protects hosting, and why removing content and leaving it up are both protected choices. It covers the separate copyright system with its own takedown and counter-notice procedure, which people constantly confuse with Section 230. Later parts address getting content removed, restoring a terminated account, unmasking an anonymous poster, what happens when a government official pressures a platform, and the recent decisions on algorithmic recommendation and state laws regulating moderation. Worked examples show how each path actually plays out, and the article closes with what to do first depending on what you want.