Article · Immigration

The Form in the Filing Cabinet: How I-9 Compliance Actually Gets Enforced

8 U.S.C. § 1324

Type
Article
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2024-01-26
Topic
Immigration

Every employer in the country completes a federal immigration form for every employee, and most complete it wrong. This article explains what Form I-9 actually requires, why the most common errors have nothing to do with anyone's immigration status, and how a routine paperwork audit produces six-figure penalties at companies that never knowingly hired anyone unauthorized. It covers the three-day rule, the document list and why an employer may not choose from it, reverification and when it is prohibited, and the retention formula almost nobody applies correctly. It explains E-Verify — where it is required, what a tentative nonconfirmation means, and the conduct that turns a compliance tool into a discrimination claim. It walks through a worksite inspection from the notice through the fines, and explains the anti-discrimination provision that punishes employers for asking for too much documentation. Readers finish knowing what to fix before an auditor arrives.

The Form in the Filing Cabinet: How I-9 Compliance Actually Gets Enforced

Immigration > Employer Compliance and Worksite Enforcement | Published 26 January 2024 - Updated 10 January 2025 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

A Paperwork Statute With Real Consequences

A restaurant group with two hundred employees receives a notice of inspection on a Tuesday. Three days later it produces its I-9 forms. An auditor reviews them and finds: forty-one missing signatures in Section 2, nineteen forms where the employee's date of birth was written in the wrong box, twelve forms completed weeks after the start date, thirty-one with no document title recorded, and eight employees for whom no form exists at all.

The full text of this document is available to Executive subscribers and above. See plans.