A campus disciplinary proceeding can end a degree, a career, and a visa, and it is run by a university rather than a court. This article explains what Title IX actually requires, who has rights in the process, and why the procedural protections have swung back and forth for a decade. It walks through the sequence a student on either side will experience — report, supportive measures, formal complaint, investigation, hearing, decision, appeal — and identifies the moments that decide outcomes. Separate sections cover the standard of proof and why it matters more than people think, cross-examination and the advisor of choice, the difference between public and private institutions, the parallel criminal case that must be coordinated, and the records and transcript consequences that outlast the sanction. It also addresses non-Title IX conduct charges, academic misconduct, and the deliberate indifference standard that governs a school's liability for what it failed to do. Worked examples run throughout and every authority is linked to its text.