Article · Technology

Nobody Is Driving: How Autonomous Vehicle and Robotics Law Actually Works

49 U.S.C. § 30101

Type
Article
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2024-11-09
Topic
Technology

A car with nobody driving raises a question every part of the legal system was built to avoid asking: who is responsible when the decision was made by software. This article explains the actual regulatory structure, which is thinner than most people assume and split between federal vehicle standards and state driving rules. It covers the levels-of-automation framework and why it matters legally, the preemption doctrine that governs vehicle safety claims, and how a crash case is actually built when the driver is code. It then covers data — the richest evidentiary record in the history of vehicle litigation — and closes with drones, delivery robots, and industrial robotics.

Nobody Is Driving: How Autonomous Vehicle and Robotics Law Actually Works

Technology > Autonomous Vehicles and Robotics | Published 9 November 2024 - Updated 15 May 2026 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

The question the whole legal system was built to avoid

Every doctrine that allocates responsibility for a vehicle crash assumes a person made a choice. Negligence asks what a reasonable driver would have done. Comparative fault apportions between two decision-makers. Insurance follows the driver, or the vehicle, or both. Criminal traffic law punishes a person for a decision.

The full text of this document is available to Executive subscribers and above. See plans.