Article · Litigation

Most of the Federal Docket, Where Almost No Case Is Decided: How Multidistrict Litigation Actually Works

28 U.S.C. § 1407

Type
Article
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2025-01-09
Topic
Litigation

Multidistrict litigation now accounts for the majority of the federal civil docket, and almost none of those cases is ever tried or even individually adjudicated. The transferee court has authority only over pretrial proceedings and cannot try transferred cases without consent. The statute requires remand of what the court does not resolve, yet remand almost never happens, because the process is designed to produce a global settlement rather than a set of judgments. This article explains how transfer works and what the panel actually considers when it selects a district. It explains why the leadership appointment is the most consequential ruling in the litigation, and what leadership controls that individual counsel does not. It covers how bellwether trials generate information without binding anyone, and why trying one requires a waiver. It closes with common benefit funds, who pays them, and why the gap between the statutory design and the practical reality shapes every decision a party makes.

Most of the Federal Docket, Where Almost No Case Is Decided: How Multidistrict Litigation Actually Works

Litigation > Multidistrict Litigation, Bellwether Trials, and Aggregate Settlement | Published 9 January 2025 - Updated 16 January 2026 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

The statute and what it actually authorizes

The grant. 28 U.S.C. § 1407 permits civil actions involving one or more common questions of fact pending in different districts to be transferred to a single district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, where transfer will serve the convenience of parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the actions.

The full text of this document is available to Executive subscribers and above. See plans.