Article · Intellectual Property and Technology

Key Legal Issues in Artificial Intelligence: An Overview

Type
Article
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2024-09-11
Topic
Intellectual Property and Technology

Artificial intelligence has moved out of the research lab and into contracts, hiring pipelines, courtrooms, factory floors, and creative studios, and the legal system is being asked to answer questions its rules were never drafted to reach. This overview maps the terrain a business and its counsel must cross before deploying an AI system: who owns what a machine produces, how copyright and patent law treat the absence of a human author, where biometric and data-privacy statutes such as Illinois's BIPA draw their bright lines, how decades-old anti-discrimination doctrine reaches algorithmic bias, and how to allocate risk in the license agreement. It also examines the products-liability puzzle of autonomous systems, the extraterritorial reach of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, and the professional-responsibility rules that sanctioned lawyers who trusted a chatbot's citations. Throughout, primary authority is paired with plain-English explanation and worked examples, and the analysis links to the deeper UpLaw resources that treat each issue in full.

Key Legal Issues in Artificial Intelligence: An Overview

Intellectual Property and Technology > Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning | Published 11 September 2024 - Updated 2 December 2024 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

A single AI product can implicate copyright, patent, privacy, employment, contract, tort, and professional-responsibility law at once. This overview walks the whole map, pairing the decided cases and governing statutes with worked examples and practical guidance, and points to the UpLaw resources that go deeper on each front.

Keywords: artificial intelligence law, AI copyright authorship, Thaler v. Perlmutter, Zarya of the Dawn, AI inventorship, Thaler v. Vidal, DABUS, BIPA, biometric privacy, algorithmic bias, disparate impact, four-fifths rule, EU AI Act, ABA Formal Opinion 512, Mata v. Avianca, AI products liability, AI contracting, generative AI, automated decision-making

The full text of this document is available to Executive subscribers and above. See plans.