Article · Litigation

Evaluating a Civil Case: Turning Instinct Into a Repeatable Method

Type
Article
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2024-10-27
Topic
Litigation

Evaluating a civil case is the discipline of deciding, before real money is spent, whether a claim is worth bringing or worth defending. This UpLaw guide walks the full sequence: conflicts and the engagement, the elements of the claim and who carries the burden of proof, the separate questions of liability and damages, the unglamorous question of whether any judgment can be collected, the threshold defenses that end cases before the merits, and the economics of fee arrangements and stage-by-stage budgets. It then converts probabilities and dollars into decisions using decision trees and expected-value analysis to locate a rational settlement range and the zone of possible agreement. Invented hypotheticals and primary authority make the framework concrete for clients, counsel, business owners, and the occasional skeptical judge. The goal is to replace a gut feeling with a repeatable method that reliably separates cases worth pursuing from cases worth declining.

Evaluating a Civil Case: Turning Instinct Into a Repeatable Method

Litigation > Civil Litigation Strategy | Published 27 October 2024 - Updated 21 March 2025 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

A case evaluation is a structured refusal to answer one question by instinct: if you spend the money, what do you actually get back? This guide turns that question into a repeatable method — elements, burden, liability, damages, collectibility, threshold defenses, budgets, and a decision tree that ends in a number and a range you can defend to a client, a partner, or a skeptical judge.

The full text of this document is available to Executive subscribers and above. See plans.