Article · Dispute Resolution

Choosing a Dispute-Resolution Forum: Litigation, Arbitration, and Mediation Compared

Type
Article
Jurisdiction
National
Date
2025-10-24
Topic
Dispute Resolution

The most consequential decision in most commercial disputes is the forum, and it is usually made years before a dispute exists, in a contract paragraph nobody reads closely. This UpLaw research guide compares litigation, arbitration, and mediation across the trade-offs that actually drive the choice: cost, speed, privacy, discovery, finality, and cross-border enforceability. It explains how the Federal Arbitration Act renders awards nearly unappealable, why Concepcion and Epic Systems put class waivers into almost every consumer and employment contract, how claimants turned those waivers into mass-arbitration liability, and how the New York Convention makes an arbitral award collectible across 170-plus countries when a court judgment is not. It maps mediation's confidentiality and privilege patchwork, compares the AAA, JAMS, CPR, and FINRA, and closes with an ordered forum-selection framework, worked hypotheticals, drafting guidance, and a research-grade FAQ.

Choosing a Dispute-Resolution Forum: Litigation, Arbitration, and Mediation Compared

Dispute Resolution > Arbitration and Mediation | Published 24 October 2025 - Updated 25 December 2025 | UpLaw - uplaw.us

A comparative research guide to how litigation, arbitration, and mediation actually differ, and how to pick the right one before the dispute arrives rather than after.

The full text of this document is available to Executive subscribers and above. See plans.