Opinion · Washington Supreme Court
In Re Williams
In Re Williams, 167 Wash. 2d 1013 (Wash. 2009)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 2009-12-02
- Topic
- bankruptcy
227 P.3d 1277 (2009) 167 Wash.2d 1013 In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Matthew Dwayne WILLIAMS, Petitioner. No. 83266-8. Supreme Court of Washington. December 2, 2009. ORDER ¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered this matter at its December 1, 2009, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 That the Personal Restraint Petition is granted, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. /s/ Gerry L.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In Re Williams. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Matthew Dwayne WILLIAMS, Petitioner.
No. 83266-8.Supreme Court of Washington.
December 2, 2009.ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered this matter at its December 1, 2009, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Personal Restraint Petition is granted, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing.
/s/ Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICE