Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Swedenburg v. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority

541 U.S. 1062

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2004-05-24
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • statute prohibiting advertising of alcoholic beverages in New York by unlicensed persons violates free speech guarantees of the First Amendment.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Swedenburg v. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
19 opinions

541 U.S. 1062

SWEDENBURG ET AL.
v.
KELLY, CHAIRMAN, NEW YORK DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY, ET AL.

No. 03-1274.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 24, 2004.

1

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Does a State's regulatory scheme that permits in-state wineries directly to ship alcohol to consumers but restricts the ability of out-of-state wineries to do so violate the dormant Commerce Clause in light of § 2 of the Twenty-first Amendment?" Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: Nos. 03-1116 and 03-1120, 342 F. 3d 517; No. 03-1274, 358 F. 3d 223.