Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Mora Zaragoza v. Baca, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California
540 U.S. 986
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2003-11-03
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- distinguishing between permissible voir dire inquiries and impermissible attempts to commit the juror to a particular verdict based on particular facts
- to preserve error on denied defense challenges for cause, defendant must demonstrate that he "asserted a clear and specific challenge for cause"
- key consideration in determining whether prejudicial spillover requires vacatur of remaining count is the relative strength of the government's remaining evidence on that count
- to preserve error, appellant must show that he was prevented from asking particular questions that were proper
- setting out procedure for preservation of error
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mora Zaragoza v. Baca, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 41 opinions
MORA ZARAGOZA
v.
BACA, SHERIFF, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
No. 03-5523.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 3, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied.