Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Mora Zaragoza v. Baca, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California

540 U.S. 986

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2003-11-03
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • distinguishing between permissible voir dire inquiries and impermissible attempts to commit the juror to a particular verdict based on particular facts
  • to preserve error on denied defense challenges for cause, defendant must demonstrate that he "asserted a clear and specific challenge for cause"
  • key consideration in determining whether prejudicial spillover requires vacatur of remaining count is the relative strength of the government's remaining evidence on that count
  • to preserve error, appellant must show that he was prevented from asking particular questions that were proper
  • setting out procedure for preservation of error

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mora Zaragoza v. Baca, Sheriff, Los Angeles County, California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
41 opinions

540 U.S. 986

MORA ZARAGOZA
v.
BACA, SHERIFF, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

No. 03-5523.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 3, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied.