Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Washington v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford
Wash. v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Corr. Inst. at Graterford, 540 U.S. 930 (2003)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2003-10-06
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating that "[g]enerally, state-court evidentiary rulings cannot rise to the level of due process violations unless they `offend[] some principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.'"
- stating that “[generally, state-court evidentiary rulings cannot rise to the level of due process violations unless they ‘offend[] some principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.’ ”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Washington v. Vaughn, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
WASHINGTON
v.
VAUGHN, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD, ET AL.
No. 03-5896.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 6, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 3d Cir.
2
Certiorari denied.