Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

A. K. Fowler, Administrator, Etc. v. Russell B. Seymour, Trustee, Etc.

304 U.S. 580

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1938-05-31
Topic
general

304 U.S. 580 58 S.Ct. 1060 82 L.Ed. 1542 A. K. FOWLER, Administrator, etc., et al., petitioners, v. Russell B. SEYMOUR, Trustee, etc.* No. 1049.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed A. K. Fowler, Administrator, Etc. v. Russell B. Seymour, Trustee, Etc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

304 U.S. 580

58 S.Ct. 1060

82 L.Ed. 1542

A. K. FOWLER, Administrator, etc., et al., petitioners,
v.
Russell B. SEYMOUR, Trustee, etc.*

No. 1049.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1938

Messrs. Franklin P. Bull and Homer C. Compton, both of Los Angeles, Cal. (Mr. Calvin S. Mauk, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for petitioners.

Mr. Thomas S. Tobin, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Mr. Raphael Dechter, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for respondent.

1

For opinion below, see In re McIntosh, 95 F.2d 627.

2

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is denied.

*

Rehearing denied 59 S.Ct. 60, 83 L.Ed. ——.