Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Hill v. Medford
Hill v. Medford, 357 N.C. 650 (N.C. 2003)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2003-12-05
- Topic
- general
588 S.E.2d 467 (2003) 357 N.C. 650 Thomas William HILL v. Bobby MEDFORD, Individually and as Sheriff of Buncombe County; and Western Surety Company. No. 389A03. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 5, 2003. *468 Long, Parker, Warren & Jones, P.A., by Robert B.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hill v. Medford. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Thomas William HILL
v.
Bobby MEDFORD, Individually and as Sheriff of Buncombe County; and Western Surety Company.
No. 389A03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
December 5, 2003.*468 Long, Parker, Warren & Jones, P.A., by Robert B. Long, Jr., and W. Scott Jones, Asheville, for defendants-appellants.
Carter & Kropelnicki, P.A., by Steven Kropelnicki, Jr., Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, P.L.L.C., by Mark A. Davis, Raleigh, for amicus curiae North Carolina Association of County Commissioners.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.