Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.
Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc., 355 N.C. 483 (N.C. 2002)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 2002-05-10
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- adopting dissent in 146 N.C. App. 187 , 202 , 552 S.E.2d 202 , 211 (2001)
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 17 opinions
562 S.E.2d 422 (2002) 355 N.C. 483
Beatrice WOODY, Employee
No. 596A01.
Beatrice WOODY, Employee
v.
THOMASVILLE UPHOLSTERY INCORPORATED, Employer,
Self-Insured (Helsman-Management Services, Inc., Servicing Agent).
No. 596A01.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 10, 2002.Mary F. Pyron, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.
Morris York Williams Surles & Barringer, LLP by Thomas E. Williams and Stephen Kushner, Charlotte; and Orbock Bowden Ruark & Dillard by Maureen S. Orbock and Devin F. Thomas, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.