Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Bare v. Wayne Poultry Co.
325 S.E.2d 484
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1985-01-08
- Topic
- general
325 S.E.2d 484 (1985) Sarah M. BARE, Employee-Plaintiff, v. WAYNE POULTRY COMPANY, Employer and Aetna Casualty and Surety Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants. No. 528P84. Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bare v. Wayne Poultry Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
325 S.E.2d 484 (1985)
Sarah M. BARE, Employee-Plaintiff,
No. 528P84.
Sarah M. BARE, Employee-Plaintiff,
v.
WAYNE POULTRY COMPANY, Employer and
Aetna Casualty and Surety Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants.
No. 528P84.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
January 8, 1985.Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Charlotte, for defendants.
Gardner, Gardner, Johnson, Etringer & Donnelly, Mount Airy, for plaintiff.
Defendants' petition for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. Denied.