Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. First National City Bank
United States v. First Nat’l City Bank, 377 U.S. 951 (1964)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1964-06-01
- Topic
- general
377 U.S. 951 84 S.Ct. 1629 12 L.Ed.2d 496 UNITED STATES, petitioner, v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. No. 998. Supreme Court of the United States June 1, 1964 Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. First National City Bank. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 7 opinions
12 L.Ed.2d 496
UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 1, 1964
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.
Henry Harfield, for respondent.
Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.
Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.