Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Diamond
356 U.S. 257
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1958-04-07
- Topic
- litigation
Per Curiam. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Diamond. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
UNITED STATES of America, petitioner,
v.
Dave DIAMOND, also known as David Dumanus, David Thornson, and Abe Slater, and Freeda, Diamond, also known as Frieda Diamond and Florence Slater.
No. 771.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 7, 1958
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mr. J. F. Bishop, for the United States.
Mr. Robert L. Brock, for respondent David Diamond.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.