Opinion · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Eshelman v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 88, AFL-CIO
Eshelman v. Am. Fed’n of State, County & Mun. Emps., Dist. Council 88, AFL-CIO, 502 PA 430 (Pa. 1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Date
- 1983-11-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “it cannot be doubted that judicial power includes the authority to select persons whose services may be required ... to act as assistants of the judges in the performance of their judicial functions.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Eshelman v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, District Council 88, AFL-CIO. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
502 Pa. 430 (1983) 466 A.2d 1029
The Honorable W. Richard ESHELMAN, Individually and on Behalf of the Judges of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, 23rd Judicial District
The Honorable W. Richard ESHELMAN, Individually and on Behalf of the Judges of the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, 23rd Judicial District
v.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, DISTRICT COUNCIL 88, AFL-CIO, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 25, 1983. Decided November 2, 1983.*431 Alaine S. Williams, Jonathan Walters, Philadelphia, for appellant.
David H. Roland, Reading, for Eshelman, J.
Alexander Unkovic, Joseph A. Vater, Jr., Pittsburgh, for amicus curiae.
Before ROBERTS, C.J., and NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON and ZAPPALA, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.