Opinion · Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Johnson

117 Or. App. 531

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jurisdiction
Oregon
Date
1992-12-30
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • (Johnson 1). We affirmed the convictions. Id. However, on reconsideration, we concluded with respect to plaintiffs sentence that “the case must be remanded for resentencing under State v. Davis, 315 Or 484, 847 P2d 834 (1993
  • (Johnson 1). We affirmed the convictions. Id. However, on reconsideration, we concluded with respect to plaintiffs sentence that “the case must be remanded for resentencing under State v. Davis, 315 Or 484, 847 P2d 834 (1993).” State v. Johnson, 119 Or App 494, 495, 849 P2d 1160 (1993

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Johnson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
3 opinions
842 P.2d 819 (1992) 117 Or. App. 531

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Dwayne JOHNSON, Appellant.

91-832-C-1; CA A71401.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted December 7, 1992. Decided December 30, 1992.

Gary D. Babcock, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Janet A. Klapstein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for 2 counts of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and criminal trespass in the first degree. ORS 164.255. We affirm the convictions without discussion and write only to address the sentence.

The court "merged" the convictions and sentenced defendant to 30 years under the dangerous offender statute, ORS 161.725, with a 15-year minimum term. The court imposed an alternative 20-year sentence under the sentencing guidelines. The state concedes that the court erred in imposing an indeterminate sentence under the dangerous offender statute. State v. Serhienko, 111 Or.App. 604, 826 P.2d 114 (1992). We accept that concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.