Opinion · Washington Supreme Court
Green River Community College v. Higher Education Personnel Board
95 Wash. 2d 962
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Washington Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Washington
- Date
- 1981-08-27
- Topic
- bankruptcy
How later courts describe this case
- statute’s contemporaneous interpretation by the administrative agency charged with its enforcement is persuasive of legislative intent, especially where construction not subsequently altered by the Legislature
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Green River Community College v. Higher Education Personnel Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 46 opinions
GREEN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, ET AL, Respondents,
v.
HIGHER EDUCATION PERSONNEL BOARD, ET AL, Petitioners.
No. 46939-3.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
August 27, 1981.*963 Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Clifford D. Foster, Assistant, for petitioner Higher Education Personnel Board.
Dean A. Floyd and Audrey B. Eide, for petitioners Washington Federation of State Employees, et al.
Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Richard M. Montecucco, Senior Assistant, and David A. Saraceno and Stuart Allen, Assistants, for respondents.
WILLIAMS, J.
An opinion in this case was reported in Green River Community College v. Higher Educ. Personnel Bd., 95 Wn.2d 108, 622 P.2d 826 (1980). We granted reconsideration, and now adhere to our prior opinion, except that the final sentence of footnote 1 in that opinion is stricken.
ROSELLINI, UTTER, DOLLIVER, DORE, and DIMMICK, JJ., concur.
BRACHTENBACH, C.J. (dissenting)
I dissent for the reasons stated in the original case reported at 95 Wn.2d 108, 121, 622 P.2d 826 (1980).
STAFFORD and HICKS, JJ., concur with BRACHTENBACH, C.J.