Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
Ellis v. Caprice
Ellis v. Caprice, 50 N.J. 409 (N.J. 1967)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1967-11-14
- Topic
- general
50 N.J. 409 (1967) HOWARD ELLIS, ADMR., ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER, v. ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS. PATRICIA ELLIS, INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER, v. ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS. The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Ellis v. Caprice. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 13 opinions
50 N.J. 409 (1967)
HOWARD ELLIS, ADMR., ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER,
HOWARD ELLIS, ADMR., ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER,
v.
ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
PATRICIA ELLIS, INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER,
v.
ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
November 14, 1967.Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, for the defendants-petitioners, cross-respondents.
Messrs. Baker, Garber, Chazen & Duffy, and Mr. Irving J. Rosenberg for the plaintiffs-respondents, cross-petitioners.
Denied.