Opinion · Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Rosenberg
State v. Rosenberg, 20 N.J. 303 (N.J. 1956)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of New Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- New Jersey
- Date
- 1956-01-09
- Topic
- general
20 N.J. 303 (1956) 119 A.2d 789 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL ROSENBERG, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. January 9, 1956. Messrs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State v. Rosenberg. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
20 N.J. 303 (1956) 119 A.2d 789
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SAMUEL ROSENBERG, DEFENDANT-PETITIONER.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
January 9, 1956.Messrs. Saltzman, Rubenstein & Kosoff for the petitioner.
Mr. Ralph L. Fusco, Mr. Julius A. Feinberg and Mr. Joseph P. Lordi for the respondent.
Denied.