Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS, 98 Ohio St.3d 1516 (2003)

786 N.E.2d 64

Type
Opinion
Court
Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction
Ohlaw
Date
2003-01-01
Topic
general

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS, 98 Ohio St.3d 1516 (2003) 786 N.E.2d 64Supreme Court of Ohio. 2003. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Case Announcements and Administrative Actions April 2, 20032002-0959. State ex rel. Underwood v. Indus.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS, 98 Ohio St.3d 1516 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS,98 Ohio St.3d 1516(2003)
786 N.E.2d 64
Supreme Court of Ohio.
2003.
RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONSCase Announcements and Administrative Actions April 2, 2003
2002-0959. State ex rel. Underwood v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 01AP-930,
2002-Ohio-2227
. Reported at98 Ohio St.3d 287,
2003-Ohio-372
,782 N.E.2d 582. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.2002-1890. N. Olmsted v. Reagan.

Cuyahoga App. No. 79627,
2002-Ohio-4426
. Reported at98 Ohio St.3d 1460,
2003-Ohio-644
,783 N.E.2d 520. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.2002-1926. Hall v. Forsyth.

Montgomery App. No. 19252,
2002-Ohio-5129
. Reported at98 Ohio St.3d 1461,
2003-Ohio-644
,783 N.E.2d 520. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.2002-1942. State v. Satta.

Marion App. No. 9-01-38,
2002-Ohio-5049
. Reported at98 Ohio St.3d 1461,
2003-Ohio-644
,783 N.E.2d 520. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., would allow.2002-2050. Starks v. Globe Am. Cas. Co.

Hamilton App. No. C-010631. Reported at98 Ohio St.3d 1463,
2003-Ohio-644
,783 N.E.2d 521. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.2003-0057. State v. Kelly.

Franklin App. No. 02AP-195,
2002-Ohio-5797
. Reported at98 Ohio St.3d 1459,
2003-Ohio-644
,783 N.E.2d 519. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.