Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

STATE EX REL. SCOTT v. INDUS. COMM., 98 Ohio St.3d 286 (2003)

782 N.E.2d 582

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 2003-02-12
Topic: general

STATE EX REL. SCOTT v. INDUS. COMM., 98 Ohio St.3d 286 (2003) 782 N.E.2d 582 State ex rel. Scott, Appellant, v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed STATE EX REL. SCOTT v. INDUS. COMM., 98 Ohio St.3d 286 (2003). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

STATE EX REL. SCOTT v. INDUS. COMM.,98 Ohio St.3d 286(2003)

782 N.E.2d 582

State ex rel. Scott, Appellant, v. Industrial Commission of Ohio,

Appellee.

No. 2002-0899.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Submitted January 7, 2003.

Decided February 12, 2003.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-822,2002-Ohio-2240.

{¶ 1}The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O'Connor, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Law Office of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant.Page 287

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Thomas L. Reitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.