Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 91 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2001)
740 N.E.2d 1111
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Ohlaw Ohio
- Jurisdiction
- Ohlaw
- Date
- 2001-01-01
- Topic
- general
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 91 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2001) 740 N.E.2d 1111Supreme Court of Ohio. 2001. RECONSIDERATION DOCKET99-1898. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Spitz. Reported at 89 Ohio St.3d 117, 729 N.E.2d 345.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed RECONSIDERATION DOCKET, 91 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2001). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET,91 Ohio St.3d 1411(2001)
740 N.E.2d 1111
Supreme Court of Ohio.
2001.
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET99-1898. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Spitz. Reported at89 Ohio St.3d 117,729 N.E.2d 345. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.00-1483. Rust v. Harris-Gordon. Lucas App. No. L-99-1287. Reported at90 Ohio St.3d 1466,738 N.E.2d 380. On motionPage 1412for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Resnick, J., not participating.00-1537. Warrach v. Warrach. Medina App. No. 3044-M. Reported at90 Ohio St.3d 1467,738 N.E.2d 380. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.00-1574. Hauser v. Cleveland Cuyahoga Cty. Port Auth. Cuyahoga App. No. 77331. Reported at90 Ohio St.3d 1472,738 N.E.2d 383. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.00-1620. Greyson v. Hamilton Cty. Coroner's Office. Hamilton App. No. C-000144. Reported at90 Ohio St.3d 1468,738 N.E.2d 381. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.00-1641. State v. Holsinger. Fairfield App. No. 00CA06. Reported at90 Ohio St.3d 1480,738 N.E.2d 1253. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Moyer, C.J., not participating.