Opinion · Ohlaw Ohio

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED, 90 Ohio St.3d 1471 (2000)

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED, 90 Ohio St.3d 1471 (2000), 738 N.E.2d 383 (Ohio 2000)

Type: Opinion
Court: Ohlaw Ohio
Jurisdiction: Ohlaw
Date: 2000-01-01
Topic: general

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED, 90 Ohio St.3d 1471 (2000) 738 N.E.2d 383Supreme Court of Ohio. 2000. DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED ANNOUNCEMENT WEDNESDAY, November 22, 2000.00-1219. State v. Johnson. Mahoning App.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED, 90 Ohio St.3d 1471 (2000). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED,90 Ohio St.3d 1471(2000)

738 N.E.2d 383

Supreme Court of Ohio.

2000.

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED ANNOUNCEMENT WEDNESDAY, November 22, 2000.

00-1219. State v. Johnson.

Mahoning App. No. 96CA190.

Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.00-1233. In re Estate of Stewart.

Lorain App. No. 99CA007422. Discretionary appeal allowed;suasponte, cause held for the decision in 00-428,Holeton v. CrouseCartage Co., Certified Question of State Law, No. 98CV7578.00-1422. Lesnau v. Andate Ent., Inc.

Montgomery App. No. 18135.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.00-1478. Saturn of Kings Automall, Inc. v. Mike Albert Leasing,Inc.

Hamilton App. No. C-990703.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.Page 1472