Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Wilson v. McLEOD OIL COMPANY, INC.
Wilson v. McLEOD OIL Co., INC., 328 N.C. 336 (N.C. 1991)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1991-03-07
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- improper to allow jury to answer question that expert cannot answer
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wilson v. McLEOD OIL COMPANY, INC.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 17 opinions
Ronald T. WILSON and Marilyn Wilson, et al.
v.
McLEOD OIL COMPANY, INC., et al.
No. 506A89.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
March 7, 1991.Hatch, Little & Bunn, Raleigh, for McLeod Oil & Loren A. Tompkins.
Donnell Van Noppen, III, Raleigh, for plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiffs.
Mark E. Fogel, Raleigh, for defendant Simmons.
James R. Glover, Raleigh, Robert H. Hood, III, Graham, for defendant Riggan.
Henson, Henson, Bayliss & Sue, Greensboro, for third-party defendant Alamance Oil Co.
Carruthers & Roth, Greensboro, for third-party defendants, Otis A. Warren and Glenda Faye Warren.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (Estate of Riggan) in this matter for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of March 1991."