Opinion · Nclaw North Carolina
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 323 N.C. 626 (1988)
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY Rev., 323 N.C. 626 (1988), 323 N.C. 626 (N.C. 1988)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Nclaw North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- Nclaw
- Date
- 1988-01-01
- Topic
- general
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 323 N.C. 626 (1988)Supreme Court of North Carolina 1988 REID v. DURHAM HERALD CO. No. 395P88. Case below: 90 N.C. App. 771.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW, 323 N.C. 626 (1988). The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW,323 N.C. 626(1988)
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1988
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 December 1988.
ROSBY v. GENERAL BAPTIST STATE CONVENTION No. 421P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 77.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 December 1988.
SHORE v. BROWN No. 470P88; 470PA88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 288.
Petition by defendants and third-party plaintiffs for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 December 1988. Petition by third-party defendant (General Motors Corp.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 December 1988. Petition by third-party defendant (LMCC) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31allowed 8 December 1988.
STATE v. BARNHARDT No. 561P88. Case below:92 N.C. App. 94.
Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas and temporary stay denied 8 December 1988. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 December 1988.
STATE v. CHAPMAN No. 429P88. Case below:91 N.C. App. 169.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S.7A-31denied 8 December 1988.Page 627