Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Hicks v. Reavis
316 N.C. 553
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1986-05-06
- Topic
- estate-planning
How later courts describe this case
- "resident” of household should be broadly construed so as to include all who, by any reasonable construction, may be included within the coverage of an insurance policy
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Hicks v. Reavis. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 22 opinions
344 S.E.2d 7 (1986) 316 N.C. 553
Charles Wayne HICKS, Administrator of the Estate of Julianna Maria Stephens Hicks, (Deceased)
No. 74P86.
Charles Wayne HICKS, Administrator of the Estate of Julianna Maria Stephens Hicks, (Deceased)
v.
Dinky Gray REAVIS and Aline Osborne Reavis.
No. 74P86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
May 6, 1986.Albert if. Walser, Pope, McMillan, Gourley & Kutteh, Statesville, for plaintiff.
Petree, Stockton, Robinson, Vaughn, Glaze & Maready, Winston-Salem, for defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 1986."