Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Williams v. Smith
311 N.C. 769
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1984-08-28
- Topic
- litigation
How later courts describe this case
- affirming the trial court’s award of damages for unfair and deceptive trade practices by a vendor against a prospective purchaser when the vendor threatened the purchaser with loss of his deposit if the purchaser would not accept the financing scheme offered by the vendor
- substantial evidence in record that sale of residential real estate was a business activity
- “coercive tactics are within the definition of unfair practices”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Williams v. Smith. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 25 opinions
321 S.E.2d 158 (1984) 311 N.C. 769
Raleigh Leo WILLIAMS
No. 273P84.
Raleigh Leo WILLIAMS
v.
Kimberly SMITH and Keefer Raymond Ling, Jr.
No. 273P84.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
August 28, 1984.Harris, Bumgardner & Carpenter, Gastonia, for plaintiff.
Kennedy, Covington, Lobdell & Hickman, Charlotte, for defendants.
*159 Plaintiff's petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals. Denied.