Opinion · Supreme Court of North Carolina
Swenson v. Thibaut
296 N.C. 740
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of North Carolina
- Jurisdiction
- North Carolina
- Date
- 1979-03-06
- Topic
- commercial
How later courts describe this case
- power of court essential to protect from fraud, impropriety and to serve the ends of the administration of justice which are the raison d’etre for its existence
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Swenson v. Thibaut. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
Norman V. SWENSON, George C. Snyder, Frank O. Sherrill, William L. Pender, John R. Pender, III, Mary Rogers Pender Murphy, Doris Hare White, D. Lacy Keesler, S. Dewey Keesler, Carson Insurance Agency, Inc., A. H. Kimball, Olivia Brown Thomas, Helen Brown Kimball, Nell V. Bates, Rose Dupree, Ann Dupree King, Paul B. Beatty, Robert L. Taylor, Stanley E. Edlund, Patricia A. Edlund, Sharon S. Standifer, Virginia T. Johnson, Frances M. Vinson, Mattie S. Gardner, Robert R. Rhyne, Betty F. Rhyne, James M. Gilfillin, John W. Powell, Rebecca P. Pittman, T. F. Morgan, Grace E. Morgan, Marie Dowd Latimer, and John D. King derivatively in the right of All American Assurance Company
v.
Chariest D. THIBAUT, Jr., Thomas Clark, Ben F. Thompson, Jr., George C. Wiemer, Jr., Robert E. Wiemer, Herman Taylor, Jr., Travis E. Nichols, Lelier J. Leleux, W. W. Hawkins, J. Malcolm Duhe, Clifford C. Comeaux, Jr., J. Alfred Begnaud, Emery J. Bares, Paul G. Backus, and Russell E. Walton and All American Assurance Company.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
March 6, 1979.Sanford, Cannon, Adams & McCullough, for defendant Taylor.
Ellison & Ellison, for defendants Wiemers.
Stern, Rendleman, Isaacson & Klepfer, Joyner & Howison for defendant All American Assurance Company.
Bryant, Groves & Essex, for defendants Thibaut and Comeaux.
Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill, for defendants Clark, Thompson, Nichols, Leleux, Hawkins, Duhe, Begnaud, Bares, Backus and Walton.
Cansler, Lockhart, Parker & Young, P. A., Helms, Mullis & Johnston, for plaintiffs.
Defendant, Herman Taylor, Jr.'s notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31, 39 N.C.App. 77, 250 S.C.2d 279. Petition denied. Appeal dismissed.