Opinion · District Court, N.D. Georgia
State of Georgia v. HARRISON COMPANY
State of Ga. v. HARRISON Co., 559 F. Supp. 37 (District Court, N.D. Georgia 1983)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Georgia
- Jurisdiction
- Georgia
- Date
- 1983-03-15
- Topic
- general
559 F.Supp. 37 (1983) STATE OF GEORGIA on Behalf of and for the Benefit of the GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA, Acting By and Through the CODE REVISION COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. The HARRISON COMPANY and Henry H. Blake, Defendants, v. The MICHIE COMPANY, Defendant in Counterclaim. Civ.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed State of Georgia v. HARRISON COMPANY. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
STATE OF GEORGIA on Behalf of and for the Benefit of the GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA, Acting By and Through the CODE REVISION COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
v.
The HARRISON COMPANY and Henry H. Blake, Defendants,
v.
The MICHIE COMPANY, Defendant in Counterclaim.
Civ. A. No. C 82-1058 A.
United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.
March 15, 1983.Barry P. Allen, Dept. of Law, Atlanta, Ga., and William H. Needle, Newton, Hopkins, & Ormsby, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.
Peter G. Mack, Alexandria, Va., Baxter L. Davis, Davis, Matthews & Quigley, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants.
David J. Bailey, Hansell, Post, Brandon & Dorsey, Julius R. Lunsford, Jr., Hurt, Richardson, Garner, Todd & Cadenhead, Atlanta, Ga., for Michie.
ORDER
VINING, District Judge.
This action came before the court upon the unanimous request of all parties to VACATE the court's orders of September 27 and 30, 1982, since the case has now been settled. After hearing from counsel for the parties, the court hereby vacates its orders of September 27 and 30. See Georgia v. The Harrison Company, 548 F.Supp. 110 (N.D.Ga.1982).