Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Southmark v. Crescent Heights

Southmark v. Crescent Heights, 95 F.3d 53 (5th Cir. 1996)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-07-30
Topic
bankruptcy

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 95-10849 _____________________ In the Matter Of: SOUTHMARK CORPORATION Debtor ---------------------------------------------- SOUTHMARK CORPORATION Appellant v. CRESCENT HEIGHTS VI, INC; GRAND CHATEAU REALTY VII, INC Appellees _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:94-CV-60-P) _________________________________________________________________ July 26, 1996 Before REAVLEY, KING, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Southmark Corporation appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment to Crescent Heights VI, Inc. and Gran Chateau Realty * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. VII, Inc. on Southmark’s adversary claim for avoidance and recovery of an alleged fraudulent transfer.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Southmark v. Crescent Heights. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
6 opinions

95 F.3d 53

Southmark
v.
Crescent Heights

NO. 95-10849

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 26, 1996

Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:94-CV-60-P

1

AFFIRMED.