Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Berta Flores-Castaneda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Victor Manuel Castillo-Varela v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Berta Flores-Castaneda v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., Victor Manuel Castillo-Varela v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 86 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 1996)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1996-05-31
Topic
bankruptcy

86 F.3d 1162 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Berta FLORES-CASTANEDA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Victor Manuel CASTILLO-VARELA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Berta Flores-Castaneda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Victor Manuel Castillo-Varela v. Immigration & Naturalization Service. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

86 F.3d 1162

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Berta FLORES-CASTANEDA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Victor Manuel CASTILLO-VARELA, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Nos. 88-7295, 89-70146.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 7, 1990.
Submission Vacated Oct. 9, 1990.
Resubmitted Jan. 26, 1996.
Decided May 31, 1996.

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The parties agree that the petitions should be dismissed. Accordingly, they are.