Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Carriere v. Chandeleur Energy Corp.

42 F.3d 642

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-12-09
Topic
employee-benefits-and-executive-compensation

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 94-40119 MANSEL J. CARRIERE and JANELL L. CARRIERE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Intervenor-Appellant, versus CHANDELEUR ENERGY CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants, and GREY WOLF DRILLING COMPANY, INC., and PETROLEUM MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana (CA No. 92-1111 L-O) (December 9, 1994) Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER, and EMILIO M.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carriere v. Chandeleur Energy Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions

42 F.3d 642

Carriere
v.
Chandeleur Energy

NO. 94-40119

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec 09, 1994

Appeal From: W.D.La., No. 92-CV-1111

1

AFFIRMED.