Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Myers v. Rodriguez
Myers v. Rodriguez, 134 F.3d 378 (9th Cir. 1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1998-01-15
- Topic
- general
134 F.3d 378 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dexter H. MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Line S. RODRIGUEZ, Arbitration Judge; Pima County Superior Court; Pat Hammes, Deputy Clerk, Pima County Superior Court; Lorraine Villegas, Deputy Court Administrator, Pima County Superior Court, Defendant-Appellee.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Myers v. Rodriguez. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Dexter H. MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Line S. RODRIGUEZ, Arbitration Judge; Pima County Superior
Court; Pat Hammes, Deputy Clerk, Pima County Superior
Court; Lorraine Villegas, Deputy Court Administrator, Pima
County Superior Court, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 97-16535.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 12, 1998.**
Decided Jan. 15, 1998.
Before: BROWNING, KLEINFELD, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Dexter H. Myers appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Pima County Superior Court Judge Lina Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk Pat Hammes, and Deputy Court Administrator Lorraine Villegas. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order filed November 22, 1996. We also reject Myers' contention that the district court's use of the word "mishandled" to characterize Myers' allegations indicates bias on the part of the district court.
AFFIRMED.