Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Marshall v. AT&T

Marshall v. AT&T, 117 F.3d 1417 (5th Cir. 1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-06-11
Topic
general

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________ No. 96-11480 Summary Calendar _______________ SANFORD L. MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS AT&T INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. _________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:94-CV-858-H) _________________________ June 5, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:* Sanford L. Marshall appeals a summary judgment on his common law battery and retaliatory discharge claims against AT&T, Inc.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Marshall v. AT&T. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

117 F.3d 1417

Marshall
v.
AT&T*

NO. 96-11480

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

June 05, 1997

Appeal From: N.D.Tex. ,No.3:94CV858H

1

Affirmed.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34-2