Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Claude Hosch v. Bandag, Incorporated
Claude Hosch v. Bandag, Inc., 108 F.3d 1372 (4th Cir. 1997)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1997-03-18
- Topic
- litigation
108 F.3d 1372 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Claude HOSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANDAG, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-2826. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Claude Hosch v. Bandag, Incorporated. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Claude HOSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BANDAG, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96-2826.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 13, 1997.
Decided March 18, 1997.
Claude Hosch, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hosch v. Bandag, No. CA-96-894-5-BR-2 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED